Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0576

reference
164-tree-1
name
0576
tree-preservation-order

undefined

164-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005442 50.852028)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005385 50.852022,-1.005388 50.852033,-1.005395 50.852043,-1.005408 50.852051,-1.005424 50.852056,-1.005441 50.852058,-1.005459 50.852056,-1.005475 50.852051,-1.005487 50.852044,-1.005496 50.852034,-1.005499 50.852023,-1.005496 50.852011,-1.005488 50.852001,-1.005476 50.851993,-1.005460 50.851988,-1.005443 50.851986,-1.005425 50.851988,-1.005409 50.851993,-1.005396 50.852001,-1.005388 50.852010,-1.005385 50.852022)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL